Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Home
About Us
Adult Basic Education Services
Archive
Bulletin Board
Calendar
Career Centers
Committees
Contact the Staff
Directions
Elected Officials
E-Mail the Board
Membership Directory
Mission Statement
New Member Page
News
Organizational Charts
Partners
Related Links
Reports
WIA Five-Year Plan
Workforce Training Fund
Youth Council
Archive: September 2008 Minutes

09-26-08  Business Development Committee
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Business Development Committee
Meeting Minutes
09/26/08
GNB WIB Office - Conference Room 207

Committee members in attendance: Paul Correia, Maria Pinarreta, Derek Santos
Committee members absent: Lawrence W. Bennett, James Butler, Thomas G. Davis, Andrew T. Guilbeault, Michelle Hantman, Lisa M. Lemieux, Roy Nascimento, Charles D. Ryan, Michael R. Shea, Jeffrey F. Travers, Marilyn Whalley, Charles E. Winterhalter, Chair

Workforce Development System staff attending: Bridget Alexander, Craig Baker

Meeting began at 8:30 AM

  1. Introductions
    1. Welcome new BD Committee member, Derek Santos, Director of Business Development, New Bedford Economic Development Council
  2. Participation Expectations:
    1. Members not participating will be recommended for removal from the Committee
    2. Such recommendations will go straight to WIB Chair
    3. Bridget will put together a list of attendance for the last 6 months and submit it to the WIB Chair
    4. Bridget will poll current members on their continued interest in being on this Committee
  3. New Chair Search → Recommendations...someone from the private sector
    1. No recommendations at this time
    2. Bridget is gathering recommendations from Committee members via e-mail
  4. Future Meetings →
    1. Last Wednesday of the month (will work for Derek if we start at 7:30 am (EDC has a standing meeting at 8:30 AM Mon, Wed, Fri))
    2. Bridget will canvas current members for availability…
  5. Approval of April and May Meeting Minutes: not approved, no quorum
  6. Implementing the Strategic Plan (see attachment)
    1. Identified & Prioritized Objectives
      1. Priority #1: Objective 3b → Develop Comprehensive Annual Fundraising Plan
        1. Bridget will submit a draft plan to the Committee/Resource Development Subcommittee
        2. Craig gave some examples of annual public funding opportunities:
          1. Example – public funding for current program + foundation dollars to increase capacity/innovative ideas
            …supplement/leverage
        3. Derek asked if the plan is to go after funding and then create new programs or go after funding to support existing programs….
        4. Bridget/Craig/Paul…we would be expanding current programs…more systemic, instead of pop-ups/low-hanging fruit:
          1. Work Certified as an example
          2. Multi-WIB collaboration as an example
          3. LiteracyWorks as an example
      2. Priority #2: Objective 3a → Refine current Marketing Plan, make it actionable
        1. Bridget will send current Marketing Plan to Committee/Marketing Subcommittee and get feedback
      3. Priority #3: Objective 2c → Develop and Implement greater Coordination and Collaboration with Local Economic Development Entities and Initiatives
        1. Invite ED speaker from each town, or a town representative to speak at our Committee meetings
        2. Derek was asked for any recommendations or if there is a list? He stated there is no list because the other towns in our WIB region don’t have designated economic development people…town planner probably the closest
        3. Bridget to identify list of economic development people and/or town planners
        4. Paul pointed out that this objective is intertwined with priorities 1 & 2
        5. Paul asked Derek about approaching those involved with NBEDC to get involved with GNBWIB → Derek suggested we contact Joyce Goodman at NBEDC as she has a list of members…they have task forces (about 16 people each)…
      4. Priority #4: Objective 1c → Develop and Implement Workforce Initiatives Specifically Targeting Selected Populations of Workers and Job Seekers
    2. Established Progress Report Procedure
      1. Subcommittee will report progress to the BD Committee
      2. The BD Committee will report progress to the WIB at quarterly meetings
  7. Confirm/Re-establish Subcommittees & Set Next Meetings
    1. Marketing Subcommittee → Objective 3.a) Marketing Plan
    2. Resource Development Subcommittee → Objective 3.b) Comprehensive Annual Fundraising Strategy; Objective 2.d) Sectoral Initiatives (Green, ABE/ESOL)
      1. Paul Correia
    3. Economic Development Subcommittee → Objective 2.c) Implement greater coordination and collaboration w/Economic Development
      1. Derek Santos
      2. Michael Shea (confirmed via e-mail)
      3. Roy Nascimento (confirmed via e-mail)
    4. Bridget will poll members on subcommittee preference & set next subcommittee meetings
  8. WIB Staff Support/Communication
    1. Will continue with e-mail based
    2. Bridget will poll Committee members on communication preferences and ideas
Meeting concluded at 9:35 AM

Respectfully submitted,


Bridget Alexander
Director of Development

09-17-08  Executive (AND) Finance and Performance Measurement Committees
JOINT Meeting
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Executive (AND) Finance and Performance Measurement Committees
JOINT Meeting Minutes
09/17/08
Wamsutta Club

Executive Committee Members present: David DeJesus, Jr., Chair; Maria Pinarreta, Dave Pelletier, Richard Mello, Roger Masson, David J. Ferreira
Executive Committee Members absent: Charles R. Simpson, Jr., Charles Winterhalter, Bruce Morell, John Fernandes, Ron Rheaume

Finance and Performance Measurement Committee Members present: Roger W. Masson, Vice Chair; David Pelletier, Edward Dennehy, Maria Pinarreta, Joseph Notini, James Snow
Finance and Performance Measurement Committee Members absent: Bruce Morell, John Fernandes, James Nichols, Charles R. Simpson, Jr., Susan Peterson

Workforce Development System staff in attendance: Len Coriaty, Steven Grant, Craig Baker, Bridget Alexander

Guests in attendance: Mayor Scott Lang, Normand Audette

Chair Dave DeJesus called the meeting to order at 9:06 AM. He thanked all for attending this meeting to address concerns about the hiring of a Special Assistant for Education & Training raised at the previous Executive Committee and Finance and Performance Measurement Committee meetings.

Mr. DeJesus said that major issues raised were:
  • Concern over the planned use of $30K set aside for the Mayor’s discretion;
  • Committee members not informed prior to the meeting;
  • Concern because Mr. Longo had not been an active board member;
  • Questions about the value added by the position and accountability measures; and,
  • Concern over the appearance of political patronage.
Mr. DeJesus stated that he and Len Coriaty met with Mayor Lang and it was confirmed within the WIB/CEO Agreement (MOU) that the Mayor has the final authority over the budget. He went over the issues with the Mayor and noted that internal processes may have been bypassed.

Mayor Lang came before the committees and gave his reasons for seeking to fill the position and cited accomplishments of Mike Longo that made him feel Mr. Longo was a good choice. He said he needed a “go to” person for him to deal with on WIB activities, someone who could provide clear information on dealings with other city entities, and someone who could take an idea and turn it into a tangible program.

The Mayor noted that Chuck Simpson and Len Coriaty approached him over a year ago and offered to set aside funds for a Liaison. He did not need one at the time but over the last few months decided he could use someone to give projects a ‘turbo boost.”

The Mayor said that Mr. Longo would do the job for a very reasonable price but said he was certainly willing to consider someone else if the board wanted to conduct interviews. He noted that others he had talked to were not interested in taking this on due to time commitments. He also wanted Mr. Longo to go after new money that would pay for the position.
Roger Masson asked the Mayor “how do we stave off the appearance of patronage.” He asked if there could be a few months of work on a volunteer basis to assess the position. He said it bothered him that the money was used for something totally different than training which is what the Committee believed the money was set aside for. The Mayor said he was not aware the money was set aside for training, referring back to his conversation with Chuck and Len.

Mr. Masson said he did not object to Mike Longo or the position, but was more upset with the process. Mayor Lang said he was willing to start the process again and he did not want to take money from training. He said he was not looking to create a job but to solve a problem.

Len Coriaty said he would take responsibility for the process, but noted the notion that he and the Mayor were the only ones to know about this was incorrect. He cited a meeting with Chuck Simpson in June when the Mayor asked if there was money for this. Chuck pointed to the $30K of set aside Mayor’s Discretionary funds. Len said that after the election of new officers, he also informed the new Chair. He noted that broader communication would have been better. He said that he and the staff have worked on measurable performance objectives for the position, and that it will support the WIB as well as the Mayor.

The Mayor reiterated that the WIB should put out an ad for the job – 2 ½ days per week for the money mentioned and see who responds

Joe Notini noted that this discussion would probably not make it to the table in 90% of the state’s WIBs. He said the mayor SHOULD get this position filled and it was exactly what the board needs as well. He said an ad in the paper would be insurance for the Mayor and the board.

Board members expressed opinions on placing an ad for the job or going ahead with an offer to Mr. Longo.

Mayor Lang said again to place an ad if that makes everyone comfortable. He would not use training money so start with an hourly rate and he would find the money.

Dave DeJesus called for a vote with three options:
  • Those in favor of immediately engaging Mike Longo for the position … 4 in favor
  • Those in favor of interviewing Mr. Longo and other qualified prospects … 1 in favor
  • Those in favor of placing an ad for the position and interviewing qualified prospects … 4 in favor
Acknowledging a tie vote, the Chair called for another vote that produced the following result:
  • Those in favor of immediately engaging Mike Longo for the position … 4 in favor
  • Those in favor of interviewing Mr. Longo and other qualified prospects … 0 in favor
  • Those in favor of placing an ad for the position and interviewing qualified prospects … 5 in favor
Based on the vote, an ad will be placed for the position.

Citing no other business Mr. DeJesus asked for a motion to adjourn.

Roger Masson moved to adjourn at 10:15am. Richard Mello seconded and meeting was adjourned.

Respectfully submitted,


Steve Grant
CFO

09-17-08  GNBWIB Quarterly Meeting
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Quarterly Meeting Minutes
09/17/08
Wamsutta Club

Members Present: David DeJesus, Jr., Chair; James Butler, David Cabral, Richard Colon, Paul F. Correia, Edward J. Dennehy, David J. Ferreira, Michelle N. Hantman, Nelson Hockert-Lotz, Lisa A. Jochim, Edward Lobo (sent Proxy), Helena S. Marques, Roger W. Masson, Richard F. Mello, James C. Nichols, Joan Ann Niles, Joseph Notini, David A. Pelletier, Maria O. Pinarreta, Ronald F. Rheaume, Ronald L. Rouillard, Michael R. Shea, Charles N. Sisson, James F. Snow, Louis St. John, Jeffrey Travers, Robert V. Ward, Jr.

Members Absent: Lawrence W. Bennett, Thomas G. Davis (called), Charles N. Decas, John Fernandes (called), Jenny T. Fialho, Dennis Galvam, Fernando Garcia, Andrew T. Guilbeault, Walter Jones, Lisa M. Lemieux (called), Dr. Jean F. MacCormack, David R. Maher, Bruce Morell (called), Peter Muise (called), Roy Nascimento (called), Christopher J. O’Neil (called), Susan B. Peterson, Cynthia Rodrigues, Charles D. Ryan, Anthony R. Sapienza, Dr. John J. Sbrega, Charles R. Simpson, Jr. (called), Caroline St. Don (excused), Marilyn Whalley (called), Corinn Williams (called), Charles E. Winterhalter (excused)

WIB Staff Present: Bridget Alexander, Director of Development, Craig Baker, Chief Operating Officer; Len Coriaty, Executive Director/CEO; Courtney Duarte-Souto, A/P - Payroll Clerk; Steven Grant, Chief Financial Officer; Annie Massicotte, Business Office Manager

Workforce System Staff Present: Patricia Garcia, GNB CC, Diann Haynes, NDS; Tim Nelson, Wareham CC

Guests: Jim Amaral, Aerovox Corp.; Normand Audette, Liaison to CEO; Alan Brickman, Planning Consultant; James F. Collins, Jr., AFC; Scott W. Lang, Mayor of New Bedford; Jane M. Jacobsen, New Bedford Public Schools, Lynne LaBerge, New Bedford High School, Alice Oliveira, Mass Rehabilitation Commission; Mark Rapoza, AFC; Robert Vitello, CommCorp – WTF; Cynthia Wallquist, City of New Bedford

Greeting and Call To Order
 Chairman DeJesus called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. and made several announcements. He announced that there was one proxy: James Amaral for Ed Lobo. He welcomed Mayor Lang and thanked him from attending.

Mission Story
Craig Baker introduced Jim Collins of AFC Cable, and Mark Rapoza, Plant Engineer of TYCO – Electrical & Metal Products to present their mission story regarding the help they received from the Workforce Training Fund. Their motto is “Inspect to Correct – Correct to Perfect”.

Chair DeJesus summarized the presentation by saying that the message here for employers is that if you have a training need, or training you can’t afford and need help going after grant money, contact the WIB.

Announcements
The Chair made the following announcements:

    Expired Terms & Resignations from the Board
  1. Michael Carreiro, resigned as President, Plumbers and Pipefitters – Local 51
  2. Christopher Cassara, Counselor at Law, Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP
  3. Lynn Donohue, President, Brick by Brick Foundation, Inc.
  4. Ignacio Grajales, President, Puerto Rican Fraternal Association
  5. Michael Longo, resigned from position of Superintendent, NB Public Schools
  6. Ramona Silva, NB School Committee
  7. William Whelan, Principal, Whelan Associates, LLC

    Newly Appointed WIB Members
  8. David Cabral, President, Five Star Manufacturing
  9. ichard Colon, Regional Director, Verizon, External Affairs
  10. Dennis Galvam, Manager of Community Relations and Economic Development, NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation
  11. Peter Muise, President & CEO, First Citizens’ Federal Credit Union
  12. Joseph Notini, Regional Director, Division of Career Services
  13. Christopher O’Neil, Vice President, Tomlinson & O’Neil Insurance Agency, Inc.

    Resignation from the Finance & Performance Measurement Committee
  14. Michael Kramer, [formerly] VP Golf Ball Operations, Acushnet Company, Fairhaven, MA
  15. Mike has recently been assigned additional responsibilities, now VP for Manufacturing & Operations

    Resignations from the Youth Council
  16. Chuck R. Simpson, Jr., Community-At-Large, Green Harbor, MA

    Newly Appointed Youth Council Members
  17. Ms. Elizabeth Lozano, Chair of the Mayor’s Youth Council, NBHS Grade 12
  18. Ms. Benita Santiago, Career Transition Coordinator, JobCorps
  19. Ms. Chris Shannon, Director, Bristol Tech Prep Consortium
  20. Ms. Emily Saunders, Vice Chair of the Mayor’s Youth Council, NBHS Grade 12
Other announcements:
  1. WIB eNewsletter went out on 9/16/08 – you may register to receive this eNewsletter by going to the WIB website - http://www.gnbwib.org/eNewsletter.html
  2. For future meetings … Service Provider Presentations
  3. The December WIB meeting is scheduled for the afternoon of 12/17/08 to begin at 3:30pm – followed by a 5:00pm Holiday Social.
Upcoming Events:
  1. MA WB Association Qtrly Meeting – Thursday, 9/25, 9:30 AM Bridgewater State College, Secretary Paul Reville from the Executive Office of Education and BSC President Dana Mohler-Faria, key education advisor to the Governor will talk about The Governor’s Readiness Project and the Education & Workforce Development Agenda.
  2. Gateway Cities Conference, Friday, Oct. 3, UMass Dartmouth, Advanced Technology and Manufacturing Center in Fall River, important meeting with mayors, legislators, key policy makers and others from across the state for a very important discussion and planning the next steps for developing a Gateway Cities action agenda.
  3. Regional Workforce Strategies Initiative, Thursday, October 23, Massasoit Community College in Brockton, 8:00 – 12:00 Noon, Jointly sponsored by Secretary Bump’s Office, the Commonwealth Corporation, and the Bristol/Brockton/GNB WIBs. Presentation of Labor Market Information by Paul Harrington from the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern U and facilitated breakout sessions resulting in regionally-based plans and partnerships to fill the workforce demands for the region.
Contact Annie for more information on any of these events. Thank you!

Consent Agenda
The Minutes of the June 18, 2008 Annual Meeting; and Minutes of the September 8, 2008 Special Meeting; as well as the WIB Treasurer’s Report through August 31, 2008 were approved on a motion by Bruce Morell. The motion was seconded by Michelle Hantman and carried unanimously.

Chair’s Report - Highlights
The Chair reported to the members that he and the new leadership team got up to speed over the summer. They met with Superintendent Bonner to inform her of what the WIB does – and of opportunities to work together. The Executive Committee members met with Mayor Lang to introduce themselves and to talk about a variety of projects underway and future work plans, linking Workforce Development with Economic Development, specifically on the 3 areas of focus: 1) Making the Workforce Development System as user friendly as possible. 2) Work hard to reduce beaurocratic languages. 3) Meet the need of employers, closely linking efforts with programs such as ABE and school programs. Mayor Lang thanked everyone for their service.

Mayor Scott W. Lang
The Mayor addressed the Board regarding the HPB application. He stated that he went to Boston and testified in front of Secretary Bump as to why the GNB WIB should be a High Performing Board. He spoke to our congressmen about making changes to the Board as far as becoming much more flexible.

The Mayor noted that if you’re happy in your work, you’re going to be in your life. If you have something to strive for, you’re going to see productivity; you’re going to see a difference in the way people think about themselves; you’re going to see youth wanting to become better educated. We need to change the way we think about New Bedford.

Both Chair DeJesus and Mayor Lang offered congratulations for the hard work in getting the HPB package submitted to the State. The Mayor added that the WIB is like a tremendous team of volunteers and that each member is a very important part of a team that is going to change the way we look at providing jobs for youth who have the choice of staying home, and for providing jobs for people who have been abandoned by the smokestack industries that have left, and the industries that have gone offshore. We need tools and new players in order to be a successful team.

The Mayor said he thinks the State understands. He’s heard many people explain why they think WIBs have to be changed. He said he heard it in Washington when he first got elected, and again in Boston when the Governor first got elected. He added that he was on a transition team regarding economic development and the first thing they were going to do was try to make the law and regulations a little more flexible so that the WIB can actually use the money that’s available. What the Mayor’s looking at when it comes to the Board is greater effectiveness, simplify things and produce more tangible results. The idea is to get away from the top heavy policies that the State and Federal Government have in place and give the Board the ability to train people and get them placed in jobs; give the Board the ability to come up with long term goals. There’s nothing less encouraging for someone than when they hear that they’ve been “put on a list for xyz, and we’ll call you.” There’s a list for education; a list for training; a list for job referrals and a possible job. Being put on a list is just another way of feeling that their lives are being put on hold and they don’t have the ability to sort through this themselves. The Mayor said he is trying very hard to simplify what the Board does and look at what this team of all volunteers can accomplish.

Mayor Lang also stated that he attended the night school graduation where 95 people went through night school, working for a minimum wage or just slightly more, juggling children and family responsibilities averaging 3, 4, and 5 years to get through. Only 74 people got diplomas because 21 did not pass the MCAS, a new requirement this year. Then people approached him and asked how is it relevant? Another example of a problem people face that the Board can and does impact is the cost of taking a course, $100 per course. This is another obstacle. After talking to Len and the Principal, we were able to reduce the cost to $65, a saving to offset the cost of gas to get there or a small bag of groceries. And the goal is to reduce it further. So when the Mayor went to Boston, he asked that they give the WIB discretionary money to get more bang for the buck - “little things that make a big difference.” He stated the need to directly infuse the services we offer with the people that are in need of the help.

Mayor Lang stated that he loves the WIB’s perseverance, and the energy, and knows that the WIB is handcuffed. He’s trying to file through those handcuffs.

Annual Reports / Action
 Committee Reports were presented by all Committee Chairs present.

Ed Dennehy presented his Career Center Operations Report with a monthly and year-to-date breakdown for the period of July 1 through August 31, 2008. Copies of these figures are available by calling Annie at 508-979-1504. Ed mentioned that 9/18 is Mass Career Day at the GNB Career Center. There will be 2 no cost workshops at the Wareham Career Center.

Strategic Plan Implementation - Next Steps
The Chair turned the floor over to Alan Brickman, a Planning Consultant hired by the WIB to help with the Strategic Plan (SP) Implementation.

Mr. Brickman presented the following information:
  1. The SP is broken into 3 parts:
    1. Objectives / Narrative
    2. Implementation Timeline
    3. Measurables
  2. The committees must commit to refining the SP to its most realistic using their expertise
  3. Now is a critical time to move forward in implementing the SP
  4. Not only does implementing the SP benefit the WIB in the short-term but in the long-term too: as it will better position the WIB for fundraising opportunities
  5. The SP did not materialize out of thing air
    1. It emerged from Real Discussions
    2. It is Data Driven .. both qualitative and quantitative
    3. It is build on current strengths of the WIB
    4. It is consistent with the Governor’s priorities
    5. It reflects the dual customer aspect of WIBs
    6. However, keep in mind this was a “fast track” process
      1. Framework for SP à the 3 Goals:
    7. Skilled & Educated Workforce
    8. Meeting the Needs of Employers & Supporting Economic Development
    9. Improving the Capacity of the WIB … making it more effective
    10. + all objectives under each goal …
      1. Approving the SP is just the beginning of the process. Now the Board needs to step-up with the support of WIB staff, and IMPLEMENT!
      2. Next Step à Focus on second section of SP à the implementation Timeline
      3. Remember, the SP is FLUID & FLEXIBLE à it’s changeable
      4. Committee Responsibilities – green handout indicates committee assignments
    11. Refine Goals
    12. Establish Baselines and Set Targets
    13. How can we show/measure success?
      1. Metrics/Benchmarks
    14. Report out on progress at quarterly meetings
Len stated the HPB application was submitted to the State on September 10th.

Craig stated that the Board needs to come up with ways to measure the 3 objectives, and noted that this is a critical time to move forward.

Additional Announcements

  1. Now the Committees are charged with Implementing this Strategic Plan
  2. Expect Steps for Implementation to be on each Committee’s Agenda (Including Youth Council) and the LiteracyWorks Cabinet
  3. We need to look at what objectives will be tackled and reasonability of measures as proposed in the Strategic Plan
  4. I look forward to progress updates at each of the Executive Committee meetings as well as a solid committee report-out at our next Board meeting in December
  5. Ron Rheaume was featured in section F of the August 17th issue of the Standard-Times newspaper. He cut the ribbon at a ceremonial opening of the HarbOur House. Ron donated his time helping to construct the new kitchen.
Other Business / Community Input
None

Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9am on a motion by Joan Ann Niles.

Respectfully submitted,


Richard F. Mello
Clerk

09-08-08  GNBWIB Special Meeting
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Special Meeting Minutes
09/08/08
Wamsutta Club

Members Present: David DeJesus, Jr., Chair; Paul F. Correia, Thomas G. Davis, Edward J. Dennehy, John Fernandes (sent Proxy vote), David J. Ferreira, Lisa M. Lemieux, Roger W. Masson, Richard F. Mello, Bruce Morell, Roy Nascimento (sent Proxy vote), James C. Nichols, Joseph Notini, Christopher J. O’Neil, David A. Pelletier, Susan B. Peterson, Maria O. Pinarreta, Ronald F. Rheaume, Ronald L. Rouillard, Anthony R. Sapienza (sent Proxy vote), Dr. John J. Sbrega, Michael R. Shea, Charles N. Sisson, Louis St. John, Marilyn Whalley, Charles E. Winterhalter (sent Proxy vote)

Members Absent: Lawrence W. Bennett, James Butler, David Cabral, Richard Colon, Charles N. Decas, Jenny T. Fialho (called), Dennis Galvam, Fernando Garcia, Andrew T. Guilbeault, Michelle N. Hantman, Nelson Hockert-Lotz, Lisa A. Jochim (called), Walter Jones (called), Edward Lobo (called), Dr. Jean F. MacCormack, David R. Maher, Helena S. Marques (called), Peter Muise, Joan Ann Niles (called), Cynthia Rodrigues, Charles D. Ryan, Charles R. Simpson, Jr., James F. Snow (called), Caroline St. Don (excused), Jeffrey Travers (called), Dean Robert V. Ward (called), Corinn Williams (called)

WIB Staff Present: Bridget Alexander, Director of Development, Craig Baker, Chief Operating Officer; Len Coriaty, Executive Director/CEO; Jean Fox, Youth Council Director, Steven Grant, Chief Financial Officer; Annie Massicotte, Business Office Manager

Guests: Alan Brickman, Planning Consultant; Scott W. Lang, Mayor of New Bedford; John F. Quinn, State Representative

Greeting and Call To Order
 Chair DeJesus called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. and announced 4 Proxy votes: John Fernandes, Roy Nascimento, Anthony R. Sapienza, and Charles E. Winterhalter. The Chair thanked Mayor Lang and Representative John Quinn for attending the meeting. He also announced that the next WIB quarterly meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, 9/17, 8:00am at Wamsutta Club.

High Performance Board Overview
 The Chair then turned the floor over to Craig Baker for an overview of the High Performance Board effort. Mr. Baker noted that the WIB’s application includes the recently completed draft strategic plan, which obviates the need to complete Section A of the application packet. Sections B – D of the narrative application include details on an Operating Plan (Section C) and a Revenue Plan (Section D), two documents he advised should be internally generated in the near future. Mr. Baker also noted that Sec. D contains detail on a proposed Return on Investment (ROI) formula, which would serve as a tool to provide consistent measurement and would demonstrate to the state that the WIB is moving in the direction of quantifiable outcomes.

Mr. Baker then noted that the Board will be asked to vote on some minor bylaw changes (Article II, Article IV, and Article III) as well as some changes to the WIB/CEO agreement to align them with the strategic workforce initiatives and with other entities in the region, specifically with regard to the skill set, knowledge, and expertise of the Board. In response to an inquiry from Lisa Lemieux, Mr. Baker affirmed that the bylaw changes are additions to the language; nothing was deleted.

Discussion ensued regarding the Strategic Plan, with consultant Alan Brickman highlighting the 4-month process that began with identifying three issues: (1) the purpose of the Plan; (2) the specific data needed; and (3) a design for the August 12th retreat, which would then articulate a future vision. He then reviewed the meeting schedule with the Board and noted that the Finance and Performance Measurement Committee and the Executive Committee weighed in on a draft Plan last week. The version transmitted to the Board last Friday night incorporated additional changes arising from those meetings.

Mr. Brickman then walked through the document components. The Introduction and Planning Method address the data-driven nature of the Plan. The Assessment Findings on page 2 summarize the findings on workforce, employers, economic development, visibility, and capacity. The Mission and Vision sections were designed to highlight characteristics and focus that distinguish the WIB from other entities in the region (e.g., the Career Center). Collaboration is a theme; there is a vision of a workforce development system.

Regarding the goals and objectives, Mr. Brickman stressed that the three broad categories are not in any particular order of priority, as articulated in the section’s introductory paragraph, and that the goals were generated from the retreat. The Implementation Plan calls for a series of action steps to occur in 3 time horizons over 5 years – rather than one every year, as that becomes cumbersome -- for each of the 12 objectives. This approach makes for a workable Plan, and for one from which a future work plan can be produced. Responsible parties are listed at the bottom of each chart. The upcoming quarterly meeting will provide an opportunity to identify key roles in connection with implementation.

Mr. Brickman then discussed page 20 and noted that Bridget Alexander and Craig Baker were instrumental in pulling the information together for this important part of the Plan, which seeks to identify the ideal metrics by which performance can be measured for each goal and objective. During last week’s Finance and Performance Measurement Committee meeting, there was extensive discussion regarding data that is currently used now for planning; what data would require additional capacity to obtain; and what data would be generated by the state. The first task, therefore, is to isolate data that is presently available versus data that is not. In addition, it would be helpful to specify which data would be a focus over the next 5 years. At that point, the effort should be to establish a baseline and annual benchmarks for each year of the Plan. The Executive Committee will play a key role in refining the chart over the term of the Plan and filling in data gaps.

Mr. Brickman then noted that all participants involved in the development of the Plan are listed in a 2-page chart at the end. He concluded by stating that the Plan promotes much more proactive and collaborative approach. In addition, assigning responsibilities creates an effective management tool for the WIB.

Ms. Peterson thanked Mr. Brickman for his effort and noted that a Strategic Plan is “never really complete.” She asked whether or not the motion should be for approval of a “draft” Strategic Plan. Chair DeJesus noted that a motion has been crafted (Motion #2). Upon reading the motion language, Ms. Peterson suggested modifying the motion to reflect today’s date and to incorporate changes made.

Mr. Sisson then referred to item 1(c) of the Metrics and Benchmarks section delineating metrics for goals and objectives, stating that the term, “other” is too vague. Major populations requiring services include immigrants, older workers, and people with disabilities, and this document should identify them and list action steps as well. Mr. Coriaty observed that enumerating all target populations becomes difficult. Veterans are not singled out in the Plan either, yet the federal government has identified veterans as a target population. Nevertheless, all populations could be included, at the Board’s discretion, since all populations are, in fact, served.

Mr. Dennehy noted that the next step in the overall Plan is to actually identify goals and objectives as they relate to each target group. Mr. Sisson observed that Youth are mentioned in Year 1, while no other groups are highlighted anywhere in the document. He further stated that he has asked that older workers and other target populations be included for past five meetings, and that he wanted his request reflected in this meeting’s minutes.

Mr. Coriaty asked Mr. Baker for clarification on why specific groups were not addressed in “out” years. Mr. Baker reminded the Board that WIA dollars have a significant youth focus; thus, youth must be noted. No group was deliberately excluded from the document. For purposes of brevity, however, it was determined that including every demographic and every objective would be overwhelming, particularly in view of the fact that through core WIA funding, other populations are served. Chair DeJesus suggested that adding veterans and disabled persons to the document in this section without delineating specific action steps could pose a problem. Dr. Sbrega then noted that the GNB WIB is essentially in competition with 8 other WIBs to be found high performing. Omitting specific groups could be construed as a weakness. He suggested adding the term “underserved populations.” Mr. Brickman agreed that either “underserved” or “disadvantaged” would be acceptable and would serve two purposes: (1) strengthen the Plan’s contention that building a skilled workforce has, at its core, services targeted to the unique needs of subpopulations; and (2) support the data enumerated in the Plan that cited youth issues and rapid expansion of the immigrant population as key focus areas. In addition, since WIA identifies veterans and persons with disabilities, those groups should be included in the Plan.

Chair DeJesus then asked for a vote on Motion # 2, with the incorporation of disabled persons and veterans as well as today’s date. Mr. Davis moved to adopt the Strategic Plan and High Performing Board narrative responses as presented today, Sept. 8, 2008, and that the Board further acknowledges that its core application will be completed with final detail by the local workforce development system leadership team with the support of the WIB Committees with intent to submit the application due Sept. 10, and with the addition of specific population groups, as noted earlier. Mr. Rheaume seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

Mr. Baker referred to Motion #1 in the packet, which addresses question 27 of Section D in the application narrative. The WIB does not currently generate a comprehensive revenue plan to the state. One aspect of such a plan includes the ROI plan. Mr. Baker then read the motion:

To approve the language in question 27 of the High Performing Board application specific to how the Board will determine Return On Investment. The WIB has historically used performance indicators from the One-Stop Career Centers in conjunction with key outputs from various non-WIA programs (depending on funder requirements) to determining Return On Investment. A new formula for Return On Investment is being evaluated by the Board for use this year and has been approved by the Board as the starting point for further development and implementation.

The suggested ROI for review is a ratio to be used at either a program level or at an overall level to show increase or reduction in employment and education gaps.

Employment: ROI = Total program dollars/# participants = cost per : Number of these same participants that have entered employment.

Education: total program dollars/# participants = cost per : Number of these same participants that have entered accredited education program (certification or degree).

Ms. Lemieux moved to approve, and Mr. Sisson seconded. The vote carried unanimously.

Motion # 3 - Chair DeJesus reviewed the minor bylaw changes required to remain consistent with the High Performance Board application. Mr. Ferreira voted to approve the changes, and Mr. Dennehy seconded. The vote carried unanimously.

Motion # 4 – Chair DeJesus reviewed the minor changes to the WIB/CEO agreement, Ms. Peterson voted to approve the changes, and Dr. Sbrega seconded. The vote carried unanimously.

Other Business / Community Input
None

Adjournment
Being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 a.m. on a motion by Maria Pinarreta.

Respectfully submitted,


Richard F. Mello
Clerk

09-04-08  Executive Committee Meeting  
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
09/04/08
Southcoast Hospitals Group – Fairhaven

Members present: David DeJesus, Chair; John Fernandes (sent proxy vote), David J. Ferreira, Roger W. Masson, Richard F. Mello, Bruce Morell (sent Proxy vote), David A. Pelletier, Charles R. Simpson, Jr., Charles E. Winterhalter (sent proxy vote)
Members absent: Maria O. Pinarreta (called), Ronald R. Rheaume

New Directions Southcoast, Inc. Staff: Edward J. Dennehy

Guests: Joseph Notini (DCS), Alan Brickman (Consultant), Norman Audette (representing Mayor Lang)

WIB Staff: Len Coriaty, Bridget Alexander, Craig Baker, Jean Fox, Steven Grant

1. Chair's Welcome:

Chair DeJesus called the meeting to order, noted that a quorum was present, and recognized proxies for John Fernandes, Bruce Morell, and Charlie Winterhalter.

The Chair then announced that future Executive Committee meetings would be scheduled for 3:00 p.m., Wednesdays, in the Fairhaven Room. He noted that his interest in serving on the WIB stems from his desire as an employer to make the work of the WIB understandable to business and thus engage business. It remains a goal to define and clarify what that work means in terms of business development.

2. Consent Agenda:

Upon a motion made by Mr. Masson and seconded by Mr. Mello, the Minutes of the meetings of 05/08/08 and 05/22/08 as well as the WIB Treasurer’s Report through 08/31/08 were unanimously approved.

3. Committee Updates

> Executive Committee

Mr. DeJesus informed the meeting that he spent much of the summer “getting up to speed” in his chairmanship. Part of that effort included a meeting with Dr. Bonner on Aug. 6, at St Luke’s Hospital which was attended by Dr. MacCormack, Terri Romanovitch (representing Jack Sbrega), Nelson Hockert-Lotz, Mike Shea, John Fernandes, David Ferreira, Len Coriaty, and Jean Fox. Superintendent Bonner expressed her commitment to early intervention and engaging parents, among other things. She asked excellent questions. Mr. Coriaty will follow up with her in the near future and invite her to become a member of the WIB.

On Aug. 27, members of the Executive Committee sat down with Mayor Lang and discussed a variety of topics, including the successful meeting with Dr. Bonner. The Mayor was presented with information from the Career Center’s annual report, the WIB’s work plan and goals, and the WIB’s annual report. Mr. DeJesus reported that the linkage between the WIB and Economic Development is “on the Mayor’s radar screen.” The Mayor expressed three areas of focus: continuing to make the workforce development system as user friendly and to reduce/eliminate bureaucratic language and thinking emanating from the federal and state government; to meet the needs of employers in the region such as Eagle Industries, companies in the Industrial Park, and those who look to relocate here; and to more closely link efforts such as training programs with the GED night program. Mr. Nelson Hockert-Lotz also noted his concerns about hiring through the Career Center during the meeting with Mayor Lang. In addition, the Mayor expects every Career Center customer to receive some service, assessment/training/job placement. It was agreed that follow-up with Mr. Coriaty and Mr. Dennehy would occur. The Mayor thanked each member of the Committee for their volunteer work and offered his continued support to the WIB.

Mr. Dennehy commented on the Mayor’s statement of Career Center functions and services and emphasized that everyone entering the building does receive services. He stressed that this has always been the goal, and the goal mirrors the Mayor’s. A challenge is if an individual simply uses the resource room, walks out, and never reports back, it is not possible to know whether or not they required additional services or obtained employment. Those seeking services are afforded every opportunity to avail themselves of those services. With limited resources, providing comprehensive services to 11,500 individuals is difficult, yet remains a priority. Mr. Coriaty indicated that he has also discussed Career Center services with Mayor Lang on several occasions and agreed that there is a need for additional resources to bolster the Career Center’s ability to provide comprehensive, quantifiable services to every person and every business.

Mr. DeJesus observed that clarification of WIB and Career Center roles represents, in part, a marketing opportunity. He stated that at a recent meeting in Fall River, he was approached by a state senator who was unclear about how and where WIBs are involved. He, himself, struggled with the specifics for a number of years. These concerns from a variety of perspectives speaks to the need to focus on workforce activities and outcomes to better engage WIB members and to better communicate our work to the public. Career Center operations are the most straightforward to that goal, and therefore, the least complex to explain, and so should be highlighted.

> Finance and Performance Measurement Committee

Vice Chair Pelletier reported that the committee received a revised Integrated Budget from Mr. Grant at its meeting. Mr. Grant explained that $134,000 was reported twice in a Youth line and that he has largely rectified the inaccuracy.

Mr. Pelletier stated that a discussion took place around a $30,000 line item that has been earmarked to fund the Mayor’s liaison. These funds were initially set aside for the Mayor’s discretion, possibly to provide some sort of environmental cleanup training. The revised line item and earmark for a Mayor’s liaison raised the concerns of the committee. The FinPM Committee voted to take exception to the $30,000 line item expenditure and requested details and definitive measures for the liaison position.

Mr. Masson said the FinPM Committee should have been able to vote on it and took exception because there was no prior discussion. Mr. Coriaty stated that the amount in the earmark is less than the 10 percent leeway allowed by the committee, and therefore, should not require any additional vote. However, he affirmed that the decision to cast a vote is entirely at the discretion of the committee. Mr. Masson responded by citing from prior Finance and Performance Measurement Committee meeting minutes that the 10 percent referred to single line items, not the entire budget. Mr. Simpson offered some clarification on the issue of leeway, stating that the 10 percent most likely relates to the bottom line budget since there are too many unknowns when the Integrated Budget is initially voted and that these discretionary pools were contained in the earlier budget.

Mr. Simpson stated the Chair and the Executive Director should voice committee members concerns to the Mayor and report back to the committee.

It was agreed that the Chair and the Executive Director would meet with the Mayor as soon as possible to discuss the matter, to inquire how the position would benefit the WIB and the clients, and to ensure it contains measurable objectives by which performance could be measured, and brief the committee.

> Strategic Plan

Mr. Brickman circulated an agenda for this portion of the meeting as well as a list of suggested revisions. He intends to have a revised draft completed by noon tomorrow, in time for the Monday Board meeting, incorporating Executive Committee commentary and recommendations.

He began by explaining the aggressive schedule and process undertaken by him as a consultant to the WIB for purposes of preparing a Strategic Plan. Mr. Brickman stated that a well-constructed strategic plan provides a framework for planning and implementation in future years. He then guided the Executive Committee through the draft document. He noted that he will add language on the WIB in the introduction, including information on numbers served and the like. Mr. Ferreira asked that “stakeholders” be defined, as the term appears several times throughout the document. Mr. DeJesus asked that the word “programs” be added to the Mission Statement. Discussion ensued in connection with the order of the goals and objectives, after which it was decided to leave them as they appear. However, in Goal #1, the suggested “family-sustaining wage” terminology was not deemed necessary. It will remain “sustaining wage.” With regard to the comprehensive benchmark section, Mr. Brickman acknowledged that the title is lengthy and that he will shorten it substantially. He also stated that much of the data needed to complete the section is not available or must be obtained from the state at a future date. This results in numerous incomplete sections. He asked if the Committee would prefer to cull the areas lacking information from those sections containing solid baseline data. Mr. Masson suggested leaving the template but adding wording stating that it is a model. Mr. Brickman then informed the Committee that Mr. Sisson has requested stronger, more visible reference to older workers. The Executive Committee consensus was that older workers are included in a number of sections of the document referring to subpopulations and do not require additional discussion.

Mr. Masson then suggested making the changes proposed by the FinPM Committee and move to submit the document for the Sept. 8 meeting.

Motion: Adoption of the Strategic Plan and High Performing Board Application Narrative Responses

To adopt the Strategic Plan and High Performing Board narrative responses as it is presented today Sept 4, 2008, and that the Board further acknowledges that this core application will be completed with final detail by the local workforce development system leadership team with the support of WIB Committees with intent to submit the application due September 10, 2008.

Mr. Masson made the motion; Mr. Simpson seconded. It was unanimously voted.

> Bylaw Change for Compliance with High Performance Board Status

A copy of the modified bylaws was circulated.

Upon a motion made by Mr. Ferreira and seconded by Mr. Masson, the Committee unanimously voted to approve the amended bylaws.

> Return on Investment

A discussion on the language in the HPB application around the suggested ROI and the supporting narrative met with approval, to use the formula as a starting point for further development as the WIB looks for ways to measure success.

           The WIB has historically used performance indicators from the One-Stop Career Centers in conjunction with key outputs from various non-WIA programs (depending on funder requirements) to determining Return On Investment. A new formula for Return On Investment is being evaluated by the Board for use this year and has been approved by the Board as the starting point for further development and implementation.

           The suggested ROI for review is a ratio to be used at either a program level or at an overall level to show increase or reduction in employment and education gaps.

           Employment: ROI = Total program dollars/#participants = cost per: Number of these same participants that have entered employment

           Education: Total program dollars/#participants = cost per: Number of these same participants that have entered accredited educational program (certification or degree)

Mr. Pelletier made the motion; Mr. Mello seconded. It was unanimously voted to approve the language in question #27 of the High Performing Board application specific to how the Board will determine Return on Investment.

> Business Development Committee

In the absence of Chair Winterhalter, there was no discussion.

> Youth Council

In the absence of Chair Fernandes, there was no discussion. Youth Council Director Jean Fox handed out an update for informational purposes.

> Executive Director

In the interest of time, Mr. Coriaty abbreviated his report, noting that the September application submission for High Performance Board Status has a $100,000 incentive attached to it as a motivating factor.

> Service Provider

Chair DeJesus advised the meeting that future sessions would include a service provider report. However, due to the late hour, Mr. Dennehy’s report was not presented.

> Adjourn

Upon a motion made by Mr. Simpson and seconded by Mr. Masson, the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,


Jean C. Fox
YC Director

09-04-08  Finance and Performance Measurement Committee Meeting  
Back to Archive Page

Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
Finance and Performance Measurement Committee
09/04/08
Southcoast Hospitals Group – Fairhaven

Finance and Performance Measurement Committee members present: Roger W. Masson, Vice Chair; David A. Pelletier, Edward J. Dennehy, Bruce Morell (gave Proxy vote), Susan B. Peterson, Charles R. Simpson, Jr., Joseph Notini, Michael Kramer
Finance and Performance Measurement Committee members absent: David DeJesus (called), John Fernandes (called), James C. Nichols, Maria O. Pinaretta (called), James F. Snow

Workforce Development System staff in attendance: Len Coriaty, Craig Baker, Steven Grant

Guests in attendance: Normand Audette, Alan Brickman, Richard F. Mello

Chair David Pelletier called the meeting to order at 3:14pm.

  1. Chair's Welcome: Chair David Pelletier welcomed all to the meeting. Len Coriaty informed all that Bruce Morell was unable to attend due to a fuel assistance meeting and that Bruce has given his signed proxy to David Pelletier for all matters before the committee.

  2. Consent Agenda:
    Minutes of the 5/08/08 Finance and Performance Measurement Committee meeting, and the WIB Treasurer’s report through August 31, 2008, were approved unanimously on a motion by Sue Peterson, seconded by Edward J. Dennehy.

  3. Reports:
    1. Integrated Budget Update: Steve Grant made reference to the WIB Treasurer’s Report and stated that he accessed the line of credit for $100K for 5 days in August and that it was paid in full after receipt of funds from DCS. Mike Kramer asked how often Mr. Grant thought he would access the funds and Mr. Grant stated “maybe twice in the year, if that.” Sue Peterson stated that her organization has been using their line of credit monthly. Steve Grant presented a summary of the modified integrated budget. He explained the modification involved additional funding not in the original budget, the correction for the double inclusion of WIA Youth Admin money, and correction for additional WIA carry-in money. Mr. Grant explained that, although the double use of the Youth admin money had the greatest impact on the Youth budget, allocations for training remained intact through the shifting of personnel resources. He said that overall funding and spending was increased by approximately $280K. Mr. Grant detailed budget increases not related to new grants, listing $30K for the Mayor’s Liaison, $15K for CQI training for WIB Leadership and staff, $14K increase to conference and Seminar for Board development, $34K for Grant Writer for New Directions, and $5K each for Marketing and Supplies to remain in line with prior year levels.

      Chuck Simpson questioned the notation of a reduction to Equipment and Overhead under DTA Funding. Mr. Grant stated that to fit in the Grant Writer as “Other Fees” equipment was reduced from $30K to $25K and Salaries were allocated back to WIA. The allocation of overhead expense is based on Salaries therefore those charges moved as well.

      Sue Peterson asked for clarification on where the Grant Writer was classified. Mr. Grant stated that it was classified as Other Fees.

      Roger Masson expressed concern over the Mayor’s Liaison position in the budget. He said he would rather see that money go to New Directions Southcoast for customer services or be used for training and questioned what benefits would be gained from this (liaison) position. Other members expressed similar sentiment. It was asked of Len Coriaty if there was a job description. Mr. Coriaty reported that there is and that it is currently under review by the MA DCS, (state overseers), and that a copy will be forwarded to committee members in the [next] morning.

      Mike Kramer asked if there was accountability or measurable standards in the job description. Sue Peterson suggested a monthly report of some kind. Mr. Coriaty informed the committee that the job description requires a monthly report to the Mayor with copies to himself and the WIB Chair. Norm Audette also stated that the Mayor told him this position would bring benefit to the WIB. Sue Peterson said she wished to have the FinCom formally disapprove of this line item and asked that the ExCom discuss it with the Mayor. The following motion was crafted by Sue Peterson, “The Finance Committee takes exception to this line item expenditure of $30,000 for a Mayor’s Liaison and asks that the Executive Committee confirm the benefits to the WIB and its customers, through formal measures, of this position.” Mike Kramer seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

    2. High Performing Board Application Process: Craig Baker addressed the committee and explained that consultant Alan Brickman was in attendance to help explain the 5 year Strategic Plan prepared for submission with the High Performing Board application. Mr. Brickman introduced himself and briefly discussed the process for putting the plan together and based on comments and feedback there would be minor edits he would complete before noon on Friday. Roger Mason stated that the plan was put together through the through the committee and the retreat and although it was just put out yesterday he favored approving it for submission but realizing it was a ‘living document.” He felt that it would be best now to have the State express their opinion on it. Mike Kramer complimented all who participated but said this does not measure up to the standard of a strategic plan. He said there is nothing in place to say how we will gather and measure data described in the metrics section. He said it has not been vetted. Mr. Kramer went on to say that we could not accomplish any of this with the resources available. He also made the statement, in regard to the State’s acknowledgement of data, “if the info isn’t in MOSES it doesn’t exist.” He said it was a good product up to this point bat it was NOT a strategic plan.

      Mr. Brickman acknowledged the board and staff for their work on the plan and explained his task. He said the plan was designed around the three main goals of the WIB: Build the local workforce, Meet goals of Employers, and Build Capacity of the WIB. Mr. Kramer said we just don’t have the people to do what is expressed in the plan. Mr. Brickman said, with regard to the metrics how would we measure the success. He stressed that the application requires that the plan have metrics/targets. He suggested that metrics can be culled down based on staff. There was much discussion of the measurements, data, and capacity of the staff to gather the info. It was mentioned that verbiage should be put in the application/plan requiring the State to provide more data. Sue Peterson recommended forwarding to the ExCom with caveats to the measurements. Roger Mason read the motion before the board “To adopt the Strategic Plan and High Performing Board narrative responses as it is presented today, Sept. 4, 2008, and that the Finance Committee further acknowledge that this core application will be completed with final detail by the local workforce development system leadership team with the support of the WIB committees with intent to submit the application due September 10, 2008.” Sue Peterson seconded and it was approved by all with the exception of Mr. Kramer, who abstained. Mr. Brickman asked about the possibility of an extension. Mr. Baker explained that this was actually a good time to submit due to the busy schedule coming up in January. Len Coriaty asked if Mike Kramer would provide detail notes to the document even after submission since they can continue to update and improve it. Mr. Kramer agreed.

    3. By Law Changes: It was recommended that the EXCOM consider the by-law changes noting that they are not dramatic but are in line with high performing board application.

    4. ROI Formula: Craig Baker explained that the State is looking for WIB’s to commit to a Return on Investment formula that is realistic and makes sense for the WIB. He asked that the committee review the suggested ROI formula and the corresponding language in the HPB application narrative and validate it as a first step in establishing something measurable in the coming year.

      It was recommended that the Executive Committee approve the language in questions #27 of the High Performing Board application specific to how the Board will determine Return on Investment:

                 The WIB has historically used performance indicators from the One-Stop Career Centers in conjunction with key outputs from various non-WIA programs (depending on funder requirements) to determining Return On Investment. A new formula for Return On Investment is being evaluated by the Board for use this year and has been approved by the Board as the starting point for further development and implementation.

                 The suggested ROI for review is a ratio to be used at either a program level or at an overall level to show increase or reduction in employment and education gaps.

                 Employment: ROI = Total program dollars/#participants = cost per: Number of these same participants that have entered employment

                 Education: Total program dollars/#participants = cost per : Number of these same participants that have entered accredited educational program (certification or degree)

    5. Operations Report: Ed Dennehy spoke briefly of the performance report due to the time. He referred the committee to the written report and to get in touch if there were any questions. He noted that ’08 numbers were very good, the only bad number was the Dislocated Worker earnings.

    6. DCS: Joe Notini reported that the DCS budget is tight. They are in decent shape after the one layoff. He said he would be continuing with the Baseline CQI training. He noted that ALL centers are overwhelmed by unemployment claims. Joe noted that Career Day is coming up later this month. Ed Dennehy noted that 12 to 14 employers are participating in New Bedford but none in Wareham.

  4. Adjourn:
    Sue Peterson moved to adjourn at 4:45pm. Chuck Simpson seconded and meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,


Steven Grant
Chief Financial Officer
© 2001 Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board, Inc.
227 Union Street, Suite 206, New Bedford, MA 02740-5946
PH 508.979.1504 • FAX 508.979.5680
E-mail: Webmaster@gnbwib.org